Spotify’s $SPOT ( ▼ 0.67% ) operating income increased from €1,365M in 2024 to €2,198M in 2025. The headline is strong. The chart is more useful.
A good waterfall does not just show that profit improved. It shows how the change reconciles, step by step, in a way leadership can audit fast.
This is what makes the format valuable in executive reviews.
It anchors the discussion on two totals.
It breaks the change into explicit deltas.
It forces a clean logic for drivers that tie to the final number.
Welcome to earningsHub FREE edition. It’s where we break down the thinking behind decision-grade visuals, one chart at a time.
In case you missed it:
Chart of the Week
A CFO-grade waterfall anchors totals and reconciles the change with MECE drivers (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive). Every bar is a delta that ties to +€833M.
A waterfall chart is not decoration. It is a reconciliation.
(f the image doesn’t load, please enable external images to view.)
Waterfall chart: Spotify operating income bridge (€1,365M → €2,198M), showing the variance by driver. Enable external images to view.
How to read a waterfall
Start/end are totals; each middle bar is a delta. Drivers are MECE (no overlap, no gaps), so the walk ties exactly to +€833M.
What the chart shows
A waterfall bridge from 2024 operating income (€1,365M) to 2025 operating income (€2,198M), with five drivers in between:
Revenue: +€1,513M
Cost of revenue: −€741M
Investment in Research & Development: +€93M
Cost of Marketing: −€34M
General & Admin expenses: +€2M
Every bar is a contribution to the same reconciliation. Start plus drivers equals end. That is the rule.
What most people miss
Many finance slides show the same math in a table, then explain the story verbally.
That creates friction in the room.
A waterfall reduces that friction because the running bridge is visible. The audience does not need to reconstruct the path in real time.
In this Spotify $SPOT ( ▼ 0.67% ) example, the chart makes one thing immediate: the operating income expansion was driven by a large revenue gain, partially offset by cost of revenue, with smaller net effects from operating expense lines. The shape of the bridge tells that story before the presenter speaks.
What the chart makes obvious
The largest positive driver is not hidden in a note. It is the tallest bar.
The largest offset is not buried in a variance table. It is the second tallest bar.
That sounds simple, but it is the difference between reporting and decision support.
The chart also preserves hierarchy. Revenue and cost of revenue dominate the walk. R&D, marketing, and G&A matter, but they do not compete visually with the core economic movement.
This is what an executive-grade chart should do. It makes scale visible.
Why this works as a CFO-grade waterfall
MECE means Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive.
In plain language:
Mutually exclusive means the drivers do not overlap.
Collectively exhaustive means the full set of drivers explains the total change.
That matters because a waterfall is a reconciliation tool. If categories overlap, the chart double counts. If categories are incomplete, the bridge becomes a story, not an audit trail.
Spotify’s walk is a good teaching case because the buckets are clear and familiar to finance teams: revenue, cost of revenue, and key operating expense lines. The result is readable and defensible.
Strategic implication
This chart is not only about Spotify.
It is a reminder of how executive communication should work in any company.
When the question is “what changed and why,” the visual should do three jobs at once:
Reconcile the math
Surface the biggest drivers
Reduce interpretation time
That is the real standard.
A chart is not decoration for a number that already exists. It is the working interface between analysis and decision.
Executive takeaway
Spotify’s FY2025 operating income increased by +€833M.
The waterfall makes the bridge auditable in one view.
It also shows the right design philosophy for finance teams: anchor totals, define clean drivers, and let the chart carry the reconciliation.
The visualization playbook
Three practical rules worth keeping:
Start with the question, not the chart type. In this case: what explains the operating income increase from 2024 to 2025?
Use driver groups that reconcile cleanly. If the buckets are not MECE, the chart loses trust.
Label the deltas directly. The audience should not need a legend or a verbal translation to follow the bridge.
That is the point of decision-grade visuals.
They help the room spend less time decoding the slide and more time discussing what to do next.
A practical guide for readers
If your team builds waterfalls for executive reviews, use this checklist before you send the slide.
The earningsHub waterfall standard
Anchor the totals
Make every middle bar a delta
Keep drivers MECE
Order the bars to match the business logic
Label the math so it can be audited in seconds
Use color to clarify, not decorate
That is the difference between a chart that “looks professional” and a chart that helps leadership decide.
Closing thought
A waterfall chart is one of the most misunderstood tools in finance communication.
It is often treated as visual flair. It should be treated as a trust mechanism.
When the totals are anchored, the drivers are MECE, and the bridge closes cleanly, the chart becomes decision-grade. The meeting gets better because the conversation moves to levers, trade-offs, and next actions.
That is the point of the visual.
Not to impress.
To decide.
Keep the signal going
If this chart changed how you think about waterfall charts, it will likely change how someone else builds them too.
Forward this email to one colleague who presents to leadership, explains variances, or owns the quarterly story.
Want more of the thinking behind charts like this?
Subscribe to earningsHub FREE. It’s where we break down the logic of decision-grade visuals, one chart at a time.
And if you want to keep the conversation going, follow earningsHub on LinkedIn.
Looking for timely, independent, thesis-driven analysis of the financial moves shaping the digital economy?
earningsHub PRO is where we turn signals into a clear point of view, with decision-grade intelligence you can use in your own conversations.
Disclaimers
The information in this newsletter is for general informational purposes only. earningsHub provides financial analysis based on publicly available information from sources such as SEC filings, conference call transcripts, and company press releases. Our content does not constitute financial advice or recommendations to buy or sell securities. Investing in securities involves risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. We make no guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information presented here. We are not liable for any errors or omissions in our content or for actions taken based on it. Readers should conduct independent research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions. By using this newsletter, you agree to these terms. This disclaimer may change without notice.
